Model performance values indicate that the environmentalĬomponents at site Se were better predicted than agronomic ones. The crop models predicted agronomic and environmental components Lysimeters at BL and Se revealed differences among models. The comparison of predicted and measured data of Dd Soil were predicted for conditions at BL and Se sites using theĬalibrated models. Environmental fluxes and crop growth of Dd Parameters were calibrated using an identical set of crop- and
Of similar soil and crop under varying climatic conditions. Soil monoliths from Dd were transferred to the drier and warmerīL site and the wetter and warmer Se site, which allowed a comparison Sites of the TERENO (TERrestrial ENvironmental Observatories) SOILCan Were from the Dedelow (Dd), Bad Lauchstädt (BL), and Selhausen (Se) Their original environment and translocated to regions with differentĬlimatic conditions, after model calibration at the original site.Įleven models were deployed in the study. The aim was to predict weighing lysimeter-basedĬrop (i.e., agronomic) and water-related flux or state data (i.e.,Įnvironmental) obtained for the same soil monoliths that were taken from To test the agronomic crop and environmental flux-related performance ofĪ set of crop models. Performance when considering complex interrelations between soil andĬrop dynamics under a changing climate. Of predictive capabilities for crop development using weather and basic Crop model intercomparison studies have mostly focused on the assessment
0 kommentar(er)
